Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 Iraq withdrawal makes sense and leaves US alliance rock solid 

Iraq withdrawal makes sense and leaves US alliance rock solid

In late February 2007 Kevin Rudd met the US Vice-President, Dick Cheney, arch neo-con of the flailing Bush Administration. Undeterred by their first meeting or Cheney's fearsome reputation, Rudd confidently explained the strategic and operational rationale behind Labor's policy to withdraw Australian combat troops from Iraq by the middle of 2008.

The next day Cheney was asked whether Labor's policy would damage the Australia-US alliance. When he answered in the negative the jig was up on the Coalition's spurious claim that Labor's policy of withdrawal would irreparably damage the alliance. Cheney added for good measure, "We do from time to time, as all governments do in democracies, have differences of opinion ... but I think the alliance is rock solid." Confirmation from the primary architect of the Iraq war that the resilience of the alliance would overcome any policy differences with a future Labor government.

Rudd has consistently said that the alliance does not mean automatic compliance with every decision made in Washington, that it is mature and durable enough to withstand disagreements. The alliance has stood the test of time, remaining vital to Australia's national security through the administrations of 12 US presidents and 14 Australian prime ministers.

Without a doubt, the efforts of Australian personnel deployed to Iraq over the past five years have enhanced the alliance. Australians have performed with the professionalism and bravery so often expected of them. Fulfilling their duty with unwavering commitment, even if some held misgivings over the strategic wisdom of the war. Australian SAS fought some of the first battles of the war against Saddam Hussein's military. In April 2003 they captured the Al-Asad air base, allowing coalition aircraft to land. The entire coalition naval contingent in the northern Gulf was led by an Australian captain, and an Australian ship provided critical support to British forces ashore. RAAF F/A-18 Hornets flew sorties against Iraqi military targets and provided cover for US ground forces pushing into Tikrit.

It was not surprising then that US personnel often believed there were thousands of diggers in Baghdad, testament to the efforts of the 110-strong Australian Security Detachment deployed to protect Australian officials. They rolled in and out of US bases, the airport and the crowded streets of Baghdad so regularly that I was once asked by a US sergeant how long the Australian division (a 10,000-strong force) was staying in Baghdad.

In Iraq, the performance of Australians working with their US counterparts forged the bonds that have provided the real foundation for the alliance over the past 67 years. Major General Jim Molan was the Deputy Chief of Operations during some of the heaviest pre-election fighting in Iraq. Colonel Mike Kelly (now federal member for Eden Monaro) was instrumental in the rebuilding of Iraq's legal and justice systems and Lieutenant Colonel Duncan Hayward led training teams in the new Iraqi army.

In making the case for responsible withdrawal the Prime Minister has demonstrated independence and candour. The Rudd Government's Iraq policy is grounded in the recognition that stability in Iraq requires a political solution among all the ethnic and sectarian groups on such critical issues as the distribution of oil revenue, powers of regional governments and demobilisation of militias. The strategic reality is that an indefinite presence of foreign troops as part of a one-dimensional military campaign will never end the violence. This can be achieved only by Iraqis through negotiation and agreement.

Yet there remains a solid commitment from Australia to assist the Iraqi people. That is why the Government is providing $140 million in aid and reconstruction funds, retaining the naval contingent to help protect the 95 per cent of Iraqi budgetary revenue that flows from Iraqi oil, and the security detachment to protect our diplomatic staff.

The withdrawal of combat troops from Iraq also makes operational sense. The Australian Defence Force is overly stretched with deployments in Afghanistan, the Solomon Islands and East Timor to name a few. By contrast, the 550 Australian combat troops providing security cover to the southern provinces of Al Muthanna and Dhi Qar have not been called out once to back up local Iraqi forces since successfully handing over security responsibility to the Iraqi authorities in late 2006.

The Government's decision to withdraw combat troops from Iraq by mid-2008 and to focus military and aid resources in areas that will assist Iraqis in reaching political solutions is the right one for strategic and operational reasons. The Australia-US alliance will, to quote the outgoing US Vice-President, remain "rock solid" well after the last digger leaves Iraq.

Peter Khalil spent nine months in Iraq in 2003/2004 working as an adviser to the Coalition Provisional Authority. He has also served as Kevin Rudd's national security/foreign policy adviser and as a senior adviser to the Minister for Defence.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Finally... Even as the very first shots of the Iraq invasion were being fired, there were individuals around the World who understood that the ultimate success or failure of the venture rested solely on the capacity of "Alliance" politicians as well as reconstruction contractors and military leaders to demonstrate the sort of integrity that would "win hearts and minds". JWH's vascillation and jibber-jabber rhetoric regarding Iraq, was just a symptom of his adoration for the "might" of the U.S. as much as it also signified his incapability to act on his own better judgement if doing so might make George Bush a little bit upset. In short - John Howard was, and no doubt still is, an obsequious sycophant. Regardless of what many people may end up believing of Mr Rudd, it's the ability to show at least some integrity that have marked these first months of the Rudd Government... and the withdrawal of our troops upon satisfactory completion of their task is the sort of honourable action that the U.S. should look to emulate if it wishes to continue being seen as "the home of the free; the land of the brave". Sadly... the Yanks seem destined to shoot themsleves in the foot yet again.
Posted by Steve C on 2/06/2008 11:37:30 AM
MEMO to the warmongers: This was one of Rudd's election promises----to bring the troops home. For the record this war has cost the Yanks 3 trillion dollars---plus untold number of lives on the Iraqi side.The backlash from this invasion has yet to happen here. Arabs have very long memories.
Posted by Richard Ryan on 2/06/2008 2:03:23 PM
Hmmm... gotta wonder how long it'll be before the Yanks will be able to extract themselves from Iraq. It'd be nice to think that when they do - as they inevitably must, they'll be able to look back on achieving the goal of a peaceful, prosperous and democratic Iraq. Unfortunately for the Iraqis, the Americans "hit-miss" ratio to date with foreign interventions/incursions doesn't provide much hope of such an outcome. While it's comforting to have an ally like the U.S. it's also nice to think that if our allies were unable to come to our aid in the event of attacks on Australian territories or interests - we would be capable of doing what's needed before we got to the point where our desperation required calling on our friends. Ahh... friends. Ever noticed that the best ones never seem to demand more and more from you, and they certainly never judge you... hmm.
Posted by Steve C on 2/06/2008 6:05:40 PM
This lengthy article might have begun with the observation that Australia's occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan are illegal and will be remembered in those countries for a long time to come and something Australians may one day bitterly regret ... especially when American power wanes and all Muslims are united!
Posted by Paul on 2/06/2008 11:14:53 PM
We should have never gone to Iraq, so coming home is a no brainer. I just viewed a video on Halliburton and noted out of 69 (tanks), I think it was 63 or so had no clorine. This is the water that the tax payer's pay Halliburton to provide for our troops. The video suggest that all troops get tested for water borne pathigens for their long term health benefit. My question is this ... How can we keeping sending our troops to die in a Nation that doe not want us there and then to pay a no-bid contractor to provide them contaminated water? Doesn't our Government have any moral conscience? It is time for this lie to end and for America and our injured vets to heal.
Posted by 57girl on 3/06/2008 12:35:07 PM
Afghanistan was for drugs - 90% of worlds heroin...Iraq was for oil / geopolitical positioning; permanent military bases and embassy. In the next 7-18 months be prepared for a war with Iran. The propaganda and rhetoric will increase not only from Bush but from Rudd. It's funny how people link Iran to Al-Qaeda... Iran is Shia, Al-Qaeda is Sunni. The US accusses Iran of training Al-Qaeda yet not too long ago the US enlisted the helps of Sunni Insurgents (Al-Qaeda affiliates) to fight Al-Sadr's militia (Shia). Wake up people.
Posted by NWOwillfail on 3/06/2008 2:38:15 PM
At least Rudd is right about something "alliance does not mean automatic compliance" Bring our men home. Bush is an idiot. Enough said.
Posted by IdiotBush on 4/06/2008 7:10:05 PM
There's no withdrawal. For every one coming home, there's two staying, Rudd supported the Iraq war no matter how much he pretends not to. What about our troops in the Pacific Islands, Afghanistan, North Africa, Japan, Southern Lebanon, Timor, no they're all staying because it's not an issue, He's trying to win brownie points, you're buying into it.
Posted by FreedomExplo on 6/06/2008 4:21:31 PM
In response to 57 girl claims of non-chlorinated water for the troops. Trust me, there is plenty of chlorine in the tanks out there, maybe too much sometimes. How do I know? I showered in it 20 minutes ago. Dan, Mosul, Iraq
Posted by Dan In Mosul, Iraq on 8/06/2008 3:38:19 AM
JWH told us he had irrefutable evidence of weapons of Mass destruction.... Since then Oil continues to rise... Muslim extremists are becoming more extreme ... Bin Laden gains more support... our western economies become weaker... who do you think is winning the war on terror... Time to get out of a Country that will never embrace western ideals .....And it was an election promise..... not that i think Politicians keep promises......It is a sad fact of our lives, that we Australia should never have followed on the coat tail of the USA to war.....Bring our Boys home and lets deal with our own problem before we interfere in anyone else's
Posted by Bemused on 16/06/2008 10:43:14 AM
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!

Q: Should we be pulling our combat troops out of Iraq?






20/11/2008 | There is something worse than having one GFC. That's having two.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...